[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:55:54 -0400 |
No, what I'm saying is that in this particular case, XEmacs's duplicable
extents make sense, whereas when doing partial kills&yanks they indeed don't
make nearly as much sense as text properties. You can't win both ways.
Yes, that is true. Nobody has found a method that wins both ways.
I think that consistent behavior from partial kills&yanks is
essential, and that we cannot do without it.
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, (continued)
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/21
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/21
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/22
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/23
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/24
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/23
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/23
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/21
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images,
Richard M. Stallman <=