[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: equality predicate option for `next-single-property-change'?
From: |
Joe Corneli |
Subject: |
Re: equality predicate option for `next-single-property-change'? |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:29:08 -0500 |
It seems like `next-single-property-change' and other
functions for text property search should take an optional
predicate to be used in the test.
Why? Have you found a situation where you actually needed this?
My use case is: the property that is being maintained is a list, the
elements of which can be arbitrary lisp objects, e.g, strings.
(eq '("a" "b" "c") '("a" "b" "c")) ;=> nil
(equal '("a" "b" "c") '("a" "b" "c")) ;=> t