[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: add info about safe-local-variable to describe-variable

From: Ken Manheimer
Subject: Re: add info about safe-local-variable to describe-variable
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:51:15 -0400

sorry - i guess i shipped that patch with too little sleep, or
something.  i had attached the prior copy of the ChangeLog (which i
overwrote with the new one in the filesystem, but didn't re-attached
after doing so), and neglected to adjust the version numbers to remove
the CVS tokens i keep in my internal copy, as i usually do.  the
versions attached to this message correct that.


On 5/15/06, Reiner Steib <address@hidden> wrote:
On Mon, May 15 2006, Ken Manheimer wrote:

> in light of these new realizations, i'm attaching a new allout patch
> and changelog.  reiner, i really like the compromise of using the
> simple predicates for safe-local-variable property qualifiers, when
> available, and falling back to the lambdas when they're not.  this
> patch includes changes that do that, and also has yet another minor
> allout fix.

Could you please send a ChangeLog entry that only considers these

As the lisp files are synced between different CVS branches, including
CVS keywords is problematic (often leads to conflicts).  Can we skip
the hunk introducing "$Revision: ... $"?

Bye, Reiner.
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/

ken manheimer

Attachment: allout-ChangeLog.txt
Description: Text document

Attachment: allout-patch.txt
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]