[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun]
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun] |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:49:04 -0400 |
From: Andreas Roehler <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:46:02 +0200
It's not just for fun I entered this matter. `beginning-of-defun' is
buggy - and a lot of forms which rely on it.
given the discussion so far i remain unconvinced there is a bug. note
however: i'm not stopping you from continuing, personally. if you post
code as the way to propose the bug fix, it that will be easier to
evaluate its merits. remember to not break callers (both included w/
emacs and external) of `beginning-of-defun'.
thi
- [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Andreas Roehler, 2006/07/08
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/07/08
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Andreas Roehler, 2006/07/10
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun],
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Andreas Roehler, 2006/07/10
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Andreas Roehler, 2006/07/14
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Richard Stallman, 2006/07/16
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Andreas Roehler, 2006/07/16
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Richard Stallman, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Andreas Roehler, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Richard Stallman, 2006/07/17
- Re: [Fwd: Re: beginning-of-defun], Andreas Roehler, 2006/07/18