[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode"
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:52:04 -0500 |
But from the lusers's point of view, it would be nice to
have a guideline of how to move over to newer and more powerful
libraries/packages such as jit-lock from lazy-lock.
(Info doesn't seem to have been updated...
Would you please be more specific?
Please show the text that "doesn't seem to have been updated",
and say the title of the section. Then we can fix it.
- "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/20
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Jason Rumney, 2006/11/20
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Richard Stallman, 2006/11/21
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/22
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode",
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/24
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Richard Stallman, 2006/11/25
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/27
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/27
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode", ishikawa, 2006/11/28