|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: Should let symbols be interned? |
Date: | Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:09:23 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 03:49:55 +0100 From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> (let (this-was-no-symbol)) Then evaluate the intern-soft line again. Now the variable is interned. Should let symbols be interned this way?Maybe it looks strange at 3:49am ;-). How else do you expect the Lisp reader to let-bind a symbol? The obarray is the way symbols are communicated between different parts of ELisp code.
In a separate obarray for let symbols.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |