[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (that binding is currently shadowed ...)

From: Kim F. Storm
Subject: Re: (that binding is currently shadowed ...)
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:28:25 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux)

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>    !(KEYMAPP (definition) && KEYMAPP (tem))
> should be done outside the other `if', so that it also prevents using
> `continue' if mention_shadow is 0.  OTOH in the case of EQ (tem, definition)
> we still want to continue unconditionally.

Seems right -- I've checked in a different change.

Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]