[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: File type misclassification
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: File type misclassification |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:29:29 +0900 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> a) accept "%!" as magic PostScript override (previous behavior)
> b) accept "%!PS" as magic override (what I proposed and checked in)
> c) don't accept any magic postscript override
...
> My point of view is that b) nowadays appears like the most
> pragmatically useful option, judging from problematic cases I have
> seen.
I agree. (b) is the conservative change.
"%" is a common enough comment character that I can see "%!" as being
slightly risky, but "%!PS" is far less so.
-Miles
--
"1971 pickup truck; will trade for guns"
- Re: File type misclassification, (continued)
- Re: File type misclassification, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/20
- Re: File type misclassification, David Kastrup, 2007/03/20
- Re: File type misclassification, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/20
- Re: File type misclassification, David Kastrup, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification, David Kastrup, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification, David Kastrup, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: File type misclassification, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/20
- Re: File type misclassification, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/20
- Re: File type misclassification, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/21
- Re: File type misclassification, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2007/03/25
- Re: File type misclassification, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/25
Re: File type misclassification, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/03/20