[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Findutils-patches] [PATCH] bug 20273
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: [Findutils-patches] [PATCH] bug 20273 |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:47:24 +0100 |
On 6/27/07, Eric Blake-1 <address@hidden> wrote:
OK to apply?
Yes.
The bulk of the patch is a new test in the testsuite,
which required some tweaks to get xargs_start to run a subshell
with multiple commands, rather than just xargs. I then validated
that the new test fails prior to the xargs.c changes and passes
afterwards on the Linux machine where I originally reported the bug.
Thanks!
Should I use the name savannah-20273, or sv-bug-20273 (both
naming formats are in use in the xargs testsuite)?
I think I normally use the latter, but it's not a big deal.
Since this is a bug fix, is it worth backporting this to the
4.2 branch?
Yes, I think it's worthwhile.
James.