[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:24:12 +0100 (CET) |
> > Personally, I prefer U+27E8 and U+27E9 which are never double-width
> > glyphs.
>
> I agree; see the xterm screenshot in the other mail.
>
> So we _do_ need the possibility to map the same glyph to different
> Unicode code points depending on the output device. So for Unicode
> font files, the CHARSET section will normally be absent, but can
> also be present and contain just the exceptional mappings.
This is fine with me. It's basically a better solution than doing the
same on the macro level.
Werner
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, James Cloos, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/14
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Michail Vidiassov, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/15
- Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Pedro A . López-Valencia, 2006/02/16
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14
Re: [Groff] mapping of glyphs to Unicode, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/14
[Groff] unicode support, part 10: \[shc], Bruno Haible, 2006/02/21
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc], Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/23
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/23
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/24
- [Groff] Re: unicode support, part 10: \[shc] and the soft hyphen in HTML, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/02/23
[Groff] unicode support, part 12: \(la, \(ra, Bruno Haible, 2006/02/21