[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Dec 2006 13:01:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
Gunnar Ritter <address@hidden>:
> But I think the most important question for troff people is,
> where is a complete, high-quality converter for
>
> +-------------+/ +===========+
> | XML-DocBook |=======>| troff | ?
> +-------------+\ +===========+
>
> With <?troff .request?> processing instructions, this makes
> it possible to retain all the typographical aspects we like.
>
> XSL-FO to troff is also worth consideration.
XSL-FO to troff would be far more appropriate. XSL and troff are at about
the same level; thus, you wouldn't have to wire in all the policy/styling
decisions you would in a DocBook->troff renderer.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, M Bianchi, 2006/12/22
- Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/23
- Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, M Bianchi, 2006/12/23
- Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/23
- Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/24
- Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, mhobgood, 2006/12/24
- Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/24
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/23
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, Eric S. Raymond, 2006/12/23
Re: <OK> [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/23
[Groff] Re: Simplifying groff documentation, Ralph Corderoy, 2006/12/28
Re: [Groff] Simplifying groff documentation, Gunnar Ritter, 2006/12/23