[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is .rd implemented at all?
From: |
Dave Kemper |
Subject: |
Re: Is .rd implemented at all? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:44:09 -0600 |
On 12/20/20, G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> At 2020-12-16T20:30:33-0600, Dave Kemper wrote:
>> Ubuntu is a Debian-derived distro, and the concurrent "local timezone"
>> thread here points out Debian's proclivity to customize groff in
>> incompatible ways.
>
> I don't think that statement is quite fair--I've known Colin for a long
> time and he is a diligent developer and package maintainer. Different
> projects face different pressures.
It's true, I shouldn't have generalized one example to a "proclivity."
But my comment wasn't meant as an indictment of Debian's decision or
Colin's work, merely an observation that it changed functionality from
stock groff, and I apologize if it came across otherwise.
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, (continued)
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Dave Kemper, 2020/12/16
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Colin Watson, 2020/12/17
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Oliver Corff, 2020/12/17
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Dorai Sitaram, 2020/12/17
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Oliver Corff, 2020/12/17
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Keith Marshall, 2020/12/17
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Tadziu Hoffmann, 2020/12/17
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Dorai Sitaram, 2020/12/17
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Jim Avera, 2020/12/17
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/12/20
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?,
Dave Kemper <=
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, G. Branden Robinson, 2020/12/21
- Re: Is .rd implemented at all?, Keith Marshall, 2020/12/15