[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [e9e92ee00811f7d0fcbde415346f7f4f7be14528] missed one

From: Steffen Nurpmeso
Subject: Re: [e9e92ee00811f7d0fcbde415346f7f4f7be14528] missed one
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2022 01:22:37 +0200
User-agent: s-nail v14.9.24-295-g629abc8b54

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 |(Actually my less(1) pull request will not find the IDs my mdocmx
 |produces via your grotty thing because of it.  Hm.  Well, we break
 |out if we cannot find the = in the K=V, and ;: is an empty
 |parameter.  Sigh.  I have to make this more robust in that non-K=V
 |parameter is _not_ bogus if it is initially empty.  Bugs anywhere!)

The "standard" says

  `params` is an optional list of `key=value` assignments,
  separated by the `:` character. Example:
  `id=xyz123:foo=bar:baz=quux`. Currently only the `id` key is
  defined, see below. These parameters allow future ext endability
  of this feature. In the typical case no parameters are defined,
  in that case obviously the two semicolons have to be present
  next to each other.

So i mean i am not _that_ wrong in claiming that a parameter
without an = in the expected K=V is bogus.  However, it seems more
robust to allow empty parameters in the block of parameters.

Good night!

|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]