[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 01/21] gnu: ghc-regex-posix: Propagate inputs.
|
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 01/21] gnu: ghc-regex-posix: Propagate inputs. |
|
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:06:55 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Paul van der Walt <address@hidden> skribis:
> * gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-regex-posix): Move ghc-regex-base to
> propagated inputs.
[...]
> * gnu/packages/haskell.scm (ghc-regex-compat): Move ghc-regex-base and
> ghc-regex-posix to propagated inputs.
In general we justify propagation in a comment. However, for GHC
packages, it would rather be the opposite: why would one not propagate
an input? Am I right?
If yes, OK for both patches as-is.
Ludo’.
- [PATCH 16/21] gnu: Add ghc-enclosed-exceptions., (continued)
- [PATCH 16/21] gnu: Add ghc-enclosed-exceptions., Paul van der Walt, 2015/11/04
- [PATCH 17/21] gnu: Add ghc-shelly., Paul van der Walt, 2015/11/04
- [PATCH 15/21] gnu: Add ghc-system-fileio., Paul van der Walt, 2015/11/04
- [PATCH 21/21] gnu: Add xmobar., Paul van der Walt, 2015/11/04
- [PATCH 20/21] gnu: Add ghc-alsa-mixer., Paul van der Walt, 2015/11/04
- Re: [PATCH 01/21] gnu: ghc-regex-posix: Propagate inputs.,
Ludovic Courtès <=