|
From: | Ben Woodcroft |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add emacs-ess. |
Date: | Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:59:13 +0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 |
On 05/07/16 21:44, Roel Janssen wrote:
Ben Woodcroft writes:Hi. On 05/07/16 20:56, Roel Janssen wrote:Dear Guix, I have a question about the following patch to add emacs-ess.Thanks, I was also making a half-hearted attempt at this.Sorry for the duplicated effort. I am happy to merge the two if you're doing something more intelligent in your patch :).
Oh not at all, the half in 'half-heartedly' was very generous.
By default, the build files rely upon a LaTeX distribution to be installed to generate a PDF from its Texinfo documentation. I know that texlive is quite a heavy package, so should I separate the output of this package in "out" and "doc", and substitute/patch the involved Makefiles?Have you tried texlive-minimal ?I hadn't thought of that. Good idea. Would it be acceptable to use texlive-minimal instead, without splitting it in two outputs?
As Ricardo suggests perhaps they should be native-inputs instead, in which case splitting the outputs doesn't help since we do not have output-specific inputs.
ben
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |