[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc
From: |
David Craven |
Subject: |
Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Aug 2016 11:55:07 +0200 |
this is what wikipedia has to say about it:
Because MIT has used many licenses for software, the Free Software
Foundation considers "MIT License" ambiguous. "MIT License" may refer
to the "Expat License" (used for Expat) or to the "X11 License" (also
called "MIT/X Consortium License"; used for the X Window System by the
MIT X Consortium). The "MIT License" published by the Open Source
Initiative is the same as the "Expat License".
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, (continued)
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Vincent Legoll, 2016/08/02
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/03
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Vincent Legoll, 2016/08/03
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/03
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, ng0, 2016/08/06
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Vincent Legoll, 2016/08/08
Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, David Craven, 2016/08/03
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/12
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Vincent Legoll, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc,
David Craven <=
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Vincent Legoll, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, David Craven, 2016/08/13
- Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, Ricardo Wurmus, 2016/08/14
Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc, David Craven, 2016/08/08