[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guix Workflow Language ?
From: |
Ricardo Wurmus |
Subject: |
Re: Guix Workflow Language ? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jan 2018 21:36:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0-alpha3; emacs 25.3.1 |
Hi,
zimoun <address@hidden> writes:
> In this context, since 'lispy' syntax is not mainstream (and will
> never be), it appears to me as a hard position.
We’ve got you covered here: the GWL has built-in support for Wisp, a
pretty language extension for Guile. It also comes with a bunch of
extra syntax support to make the definition of workflows easier.
Here’s a convoluted artificial example:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
define-module
test
use-modules
guix workflows
guix processes
gnu packages bioinformatics
gnu packages python
process: simple-test
package-inputs
list python samtools
data-inputs
list "sample.bam" "hg38.fa" "abc"
procedure #---{python}
import os
def hello():
print "hello from python 3"
print GWL['data-inputs']
print GWL['name']
hello()
---
workflow: example-workflow
processes
list simple-test
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Put this in a file called “test.wisp” and add the directory to the
GUIX_WORKFLOW_PATH and you’re good to go.
Note that the “simple-test” process definition embeds Python code. A
number of other languages can be supported easily.
I don’t think syntax should hold you back.
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
- Guix Workflow Language ?, zimoun, 2018/01/24
- Re: Guix Workflow Language ?, Roel Janssen, 2018/01/24
- Re: Guix Workflow Language ?, zimoun, 2018/01/25
- Re: Guix Workflow Language ?,
Ricardo Wurmus <=
- Re: Guix Workflow Language ?, Roel Janssen, 2018/01/25
- RE: Guix Workflow Language ?, Cook, Malcolm, 2018/01/25
- Re: Guix Workflow Language ?, Pjotr Prins, 2018/01/26
- Re: Guix Workflow Language ?, zimoun, 2018/01/29
- Re: Guix Workflow Language ?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/01/29