[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60
|
From: |
Pjotr Prins |
|
Subject: |
Re: More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60 |
|
Date: |
Sat, 22 Sep 2018 09:11:42 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:35:17PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> How would you feel about doing further Rust work on a separate branch,
> and periodically (maybe 2-4 times per month) merging the collected
> improvements into master?
Or have a stable package which is a good idea anyway, especially with
boostrapping compilers.
Pj.
- More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60, Mark H Weaver, 2018/09/21
- Re: More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60,
Pjotr Prins <=
- Re: More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60, Danny Milosavljevic, 2018/09/22
- Re: More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60, Mark H Weaver, 2018/09/22
- Re: More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/09/23
- Re: More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60, Mike Gerwitz, 2018/09/22
- Re: More stability needed in our Rust packages, for IceCat 60, Clément Lassieur, 2018/09/24