[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merge wip-haskell?
From: |
Jakub Kądziołka |
Subject: |
Re: merge wip-haskell? |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Aug 2020 17:46:17 +0200 |
On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 08:12:36AM -0700, John Soo wrote:
> I would rather wait until some evidence that the closure size would be too
> large. Also I’m not sure propagation is necessary for dependents to find
> libraries or use paths from an input.
Ricardo already explained that this is indeed the case.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, (continued)
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/09
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/12
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/13
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/15
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/17
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/08/24
Re: merge wip-haskell?, Jakub Kądziołka, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?,
Jakub Kądziołka <=
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/07
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/08/24
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/24
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ludovic Courtès, 2020/08/28
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/28
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/28
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, Timothy Sample, 2020/08/29
- Re: merge wip-haskell?, John Soo, 2020/08/29
Re: merge wip-haskell?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2020/08/07