[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?
From: |
Andreas Enge |
Subject: |
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere? |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:57:12 +0200 |
Hello,
on the bikeshedding front: I find #true and #false confusing, since
everything I see on the Scheme language seems to use #t and #f. My first
impression was that #true and #false were guilisms...
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:36:06PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> Maxim Cournoyer 写道:
> > I'd only agree to such a change if it's already been standardized in the
> > RnRS as such
> Sure, I think that's implied. #true and #false are part of the R7RS-small
> standard.
...but since this does not seem to be the case, I can live with either.
Try this for the fun of it:
$ guile
scheme@(guile-user)> (eq? #t #true)
$1 = #t
So this would be another argument to stay with #t.
Andreas
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Vagrant Cascadian, 2020/10/16
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Danny Milosavljevic, 2020/10/16
Re: Using #true and #false everywhere?, Andreas Enge, 2020/10/20