[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure
From: |
Konrad Hinsen |
Subject: |
Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Feb 2022 06:57:40 +0100 |
Hi Ludo,
> Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hinsen@fastmail.net> skribis:
>
>> To see the failure, do
>>
>> guix time-machine \
>> --commit=7357b3d7a52eb5db1674012c50d308d792741c48 \
>> -- build openblas
>
> For the record, there’s still a substitute available for this one:
...
> That doesn’t solve the fact that OpenBLAS compilation is not
> reproducible, as zimoun noted¹, and we need to fix it, but at least this
> colleague of yours should have been able to fetch substitutes, no?
Good point. If I try to use it now, it works, fetching the substitute.
Back when I started investigating this, on the same machine, Guix tried
to build locally. So I guess there was some ephemeral problem with
accessing the substitute server.
Cheers,
Konrad
- Investigating a reproducibility failure, Konrad Hinsen, 2022/02/01
- Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure, zimoun, 2022/02/02
- Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure, zimoun, 2022/02/02
- Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure, zimoun, 2022/02/03
- Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/02/05
- Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure, Bengt Richter, 2022/02/15
- Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure, zimoun, 2022/02/16
- Re: Investigating a reproducibility failure, Konrad Hinsen, 2022/02/16