[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The case for moving raw binaries
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: The case for moving raw binaries |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2022 18:55:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op do 28-04-2022 om 18:37 [+0200]:
> the shell by typing a dot and using tab completion. What's more, in
> some build systems there might be two (or even more) off them. This
> makes a generic wrap after wrap pattern almost impossible to achieve.
>
> So, what's the fix? I propose moving rawbins to a different location.
> libexec would spring to mind as a place in which we could hide them, so
How does this help with double wrapping? Whether the wrappers /
originals are put in /bin or $RAWBIN_DIR, it's still wrapped twice.
Also, FWIW, double-wrapping works nicely for 'wrap-program' -- it just
appende or prepended some extra X=Y lines. With some work and test
cases, 'wrap-script' could be extended to support such a thing as well.
Greetings,
Maxime.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: The case for moving raw binaries, zimoun, 2022/04/29