[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repology and outdated packages
From: |
Vagrant Cascadian |
Subject: |
Re: Repology and outdated packages |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:46:17 -0700 |
On 2022-06-07, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> kiasoc5@disroot.org writes:
>
>> I've been watching the Repology page for Guix and I've noticed that
>> we've dropped to 51% outdated packages
>> [https://repology.org/repository/gnuguix]. We used to be at 40%
>> outdated packages a few months ago.
>
> Repology hasn't been able to caught Guix package updates for a while
> now. As a consequence, many packages are marked as outdated in Repology
> even though they are not.
I wondered about this again, and was pointed to:
https://github.com/repology/repology-updater/issues/1261
Appears that where the website is hosted might indirectly (e.g. nobody
explicitly configured this on guix infrastructure) have traffic
originating in Russian blocked...
Wonder if it makes sense to sync the files to multiple sites and put in
round-robin DNS? Apparently it is already available at bayfront.
live well,
vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Repology and outdated packages,
Vagrant Cascadian <=