[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: valgrind
|
From: |
Andreas Enge |
|
Subject: |
Re: valgrind |
|
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2023 14:16:32 +0100 |
Am Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:39:29PM +0100 schrieb zimoun:
> Is the package ’valgrind/interactive’ accessible with valgrind@3.17
> needed? Indeed, maybe it could be dropped, especially if it is broken
> for some use-case.
I do not know whether it is broken; the question is rather whether it is
needed: We do not normally keep several versions of packages around unless
there is a good reason, and if there is one, it does not seem to be
documented here.
Similarly for valgrind-noninteractive 3.17; maybe if it is to be removed
and replaced by valgrind-noninteractive 3.20, this will have to be done
on a particular branch, or maybe it is indeed needed.
The need for valgrind-noninteractive is also unclear.
Andreas