[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Why is it acceptable to have digital-ocean-configuration in the Guix?
From: |
Tomas Volf |
Subject: |
Why is it acceptable to have digital-ocean-configuration in the Guix? |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:33:57 +0100 |
Greetings,
I would like to inquire regarding digital-ocean-configuration type used for
provisioning DigitalOcean Droplets. I do not understand why it is acceptable to
have this type in the source code. Reading the Free GNU/Linux distributions
criteria[0] I see this sentence (emphasis mine):
> This means they will include, and *propose*, exclusively free software.
As far as I know DigitalOcean Droplets are not free software (please correct me
if I am wrong). I contemplated on this for a bit, and I do not understand why
it is acceptable.
Would someone be so kind to explain the reason to me?
Thank you and have a nice day,
Tomas Volf
0: https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html
--
There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Why is it acceptable to have digital-ocean-configuration in the Guix?,
Tomas Volf <=