[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Matching labels with buttons
|
From: |
Heime |
|
Subject: |
Re: Matching labels with buttons |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:24:23 +0000 |
On Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 at 1:42 AM, Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@gmx.net>
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:58:05 +0000 Heime heimeborgia@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> >
> > On Tuesday, July 16th, 2024 at 12:52 AM, Stephen Berman
> > stephen.berman@gmx.net wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 12:35:53 +0000 Heime heimeborgia@protonmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Monday, July 15th, 2024 at 11:56 PM, Stephen Berman
> > > > stephen.berman@gmx.net wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 11:25:28 +0000 Heime heimeborgia@protonmail.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Monday, July 15th, 2024 at 11:17 PM, Heime
> > > > > > heimeborgia@protonmail.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I want to match cases such as
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Label [-]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Have constructed the following regexp, but it does not match the
> > > > > > > above
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "\\(.\\)\\(\\s-\\[\\-\\]\\s-\\)"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I aw using
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > (when (string-match "\\(.\\)\\(\\s-\\[\\-\\]\\s-\\)" text)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In the code I have
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (if (string-match "\\(\\s-\\[\\-\\]\\s-\\)\\(.*\\)" label) ; [-] LB
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (progn
> > > > > > (setq bt (match-string 1 label))
> > > > > > (setq lb (match-string 2 label))
> > > > > > (setq result
> > > > > > (concat bt (propertize lb 'face '(:foreground "red")))))
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (when (string-match "\\(.\\)\\(\\s-\\[\\-\\]\\s-*\\)" label) ; LB
> > > > > > [-]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (setq lb (match-string 1 label))
> > > > > > (setq bt (match-string 2 label))
> > > > > > (setq result
> > > > > > (concat (propertize lb 'face '(:foreground "red")) bt)))
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Doing some tests with
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "OFF [-]"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > keeps matching the first string-match
> > > > >
> > > > > That's because your regexp isn't anchored, so string-match succeeds if
> > > > > it finds a match anywhere in the string passed to it. To avoid this,
> > > > > start the regexp with "\\`", which anchors it to the start of the
> > > > > string
> > > > > being matched against; see (info "(elisp) Regexp Backslash").
> > > > >
> > > > > Steve Berman
> > > >
> > > > I would like to have two regex expressions, one to match only " [-]
> > > > LABEL " and
> > > > another to match only " LABEL [-] ". With any number of whitespace.
> > > >
> > > > Can one use "^" ? Or is "\\`" preferred ?
> > >
> > > If you are always matching against a string, e.g. just using
> > > string-match, then IIUC "^" and "\\`" give the same results. If you are
> > > matching against test in a buffer, e.g. with re-search-forward,
> > > looking-at etc., then they can differ: "^" matches the beginning the the
> > > line containing the matched string, "\\\\\\\\`" the beginning of the
> > > string
> > > itself, regardless of where in the line it is (at point-min the results
> > > are the same).
> > >
> > > > And can one use "[[:space:]]" rather
> > > > than "\\s-" ? Which is preferred ?
> > >
> > > IIUC these both give the same results.
> > >
> > > Steve Berman
> >
> > Would I introduce \\` before the first grouping
> >
> > "\\`\\(\\s-\\[\\-\\]\\s-\\)\\(.*\\)"
>
>
> Since "\\`" matches the empty string, I don't think it matters whether
> it's inside or outside of the group. But since in this case it's
> anchoring the entire regexp, it seems conceptually preferable to keep it
> outside (in contrast, e.g., to the case where the regexp is a
> disjunction and you only want to anchor one of the disjuncts).
>
> > How would I print \\` in a docstring ?
>
>
> You have to escape the "`": \\\\\\\\=` (not \\=\\`).
>
> Steve Berman
I also have to handle the case of " LABEL [-] " with a different regex, so I can
distinguish between " [-] LABEL " and " LABEL [-] ".
- Matching labels with buttons, Heime, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Heime, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Stephen Berman, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Heime, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Stephen Berman, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Heime, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Stephen Berman, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons,
Heime <=
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Heime, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Stephen Berman, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Heime, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Stephen Berman, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Heime, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Stephen Berman, 2024/07/15
- Re: Matching labels with buttons, Heime, 2024/07/15
Re: Matching labels with buttons, Bruno Barbier, 2024/07/15