[Savannah-help-public] [sr #107417] TLS Renegotiation Indication Extension (proposed standard RFC 5746) support

[Matt McCutchen]

Follow-up Comment #5, sr #107417 (project administration):

> Mixing "RFC" and "standard" is a confusion I don't want to spread.
I did not intend to do any such thing.  I was only challenging your argument
in comment #1.  My point is that the technology is mature and addresses a
pressing need, therefore it should be deployed.  "RFC 5746" is simply the most
convenient way I have to refer to the technology; I don't care about the IETF
status of that document.

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107417>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/