[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fusermount vs fusermount3

From: Michael Albinus
Subject: Re: fusermount vs fusermount3
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 15:14:06 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Stephen Gildea <> writes:

Hi Stephen,

> Using fusermount worked for me.  I gave it the same arguments
> tramp-fuse would have used with fusermount3:
> fusermount -u /tmp/tramp.sshfs.remotehost
> I tested this on Ubuntu 20.04, which has fuse package 2.9.9-3.

Yep, it is just the difference between FUSE2 and FUSE3:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
# fusermount --version
fusermount version: 2.9.9
# fusermount3 --version
fusermount3 version: 3.10.4
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I've implemented this just now:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun tramp-fuse-get-fusermount ()
  "Determine the local `fusermount' command."
  ;; We use key nil for local connection properties.
  (with-tramp-connection-property nil "fusermount"
    (or (executable-find "fusermount3")
        (executable-find "fusermount"))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Will push it when the rest is finished.

Best regards, Michael.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]