Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

autoconf-patches (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue Apr 29 2008 16:42:32 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• April 29, 2008
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bob Proulx, 16:42
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Eric Blake, 08:44
• April 28, 2008
  • Re: tr portability, Ralf Wildenhues, 17:12
• April 26, 2008
  • Re: tr portability, Bruno Haible, 09:21
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bruno Haible, 09:18
  • Re: tr portability, Eric Blake, 08:44
  • Re: tr portability, Eric Blake, 08:32
• April 15, 2008
  • mention git vs. bootstrapping, Eric Blake, 09:13
• April 14, 2008
  • Re: New tests: errexit, input from stdin., Ralf Wildenhues, 17:14
  • Re: New tests: errexit, input from stdin., Eric Blake, 09:17
• April 13, 2008
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Ralf Wildenhues, 16:15
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bob Proulx, 16:10
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bruno Haible, 14:34
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:51
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bruno Haible, 11:17
  • Re: NEWS: Post-release update., Eric Blake, 09:04
  • New tests: errexit, input from stdin., Ralf Wildenhues, 05:47
  • NEWS: Post-release update., Ralf Wildenhues, 05:44
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, Ralf Wildenhues, 04:52
• April 12, 2008
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, Bruno Haible, 21:26
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:13
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, Bruno Haible, 13:49
• April 10, 2008
  • AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION quoting, Eric Blake, 16:02
• April 09, 2008
  • Re: stronger docs on @SHELL@ usage in Makefile, Eric Blake, 22:10
  • Re: libtool 2.2.2 does not work on OSF/1 4.0d, Ralf Wildenhues, 20:07
  • Re: stronger docs on @SHELL@ usage in Makefile, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:27
  • stronger docs on @SHELL@ usage in Makefile, Eric Blake, 14:16
  • Re: 2.62 nearly ready, Eric Blake, 12:29
• April 08, 2008
  • Re: 2.62 nearly ready, Eric Blake, 17:07
• April 07, 2008
  • Re: Stack-like AC_LANG_WERROR, Andrey Simonenko, 05:18
• April 06, 2008
  • Re: Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, ziedar, 11:17
  • 2.62 nearly ready, Eric Blake, 10:46
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Elbert Pol, 07:27
• April 05, 2008
  • Working os/2 configuratie, Elbert Pol, 18:42
  • Re: Working os/2 configuratie, Eric Blake, 18:27
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 18:12
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 17:39
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 15:50
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 12:24
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 11:54
  • Re: configure/makefile cleanup, Ralf Wildenhues, 11:33
  • Re: configure/makefile cleanup, Eric Blake, 11:26
  • Re: configure/makefile cleanup, Eric Blake, 09:43
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 09:34
  • Re: configure/makefile cleanup, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:33
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 09:26
  • configure/makefile cleanup, Eric Blake, 09:15
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 09:13
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 09:08
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 09:04
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 08:59
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 08:57
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 08:54
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 08:54
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 08:51
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 08:48
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 08:45
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 08:38
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 08:26
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:30
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 07:14
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 06:13
  • carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 05:48
• April 03, 2008
  • Re: upstream file sync, Eric Blake, 19:05
  • Re: upstream file sync, Eric Blake, 13:22
  • Re: upstream file sync, Eric Blake, 11:11
  • upstream file sync, Eric Blake, 08:29
• April 02, 2008
  • Recommend M4 1.4.11, Eric Blake, 15:27
  • Re: Stack-like AC_LANG_WERROR, Andrey Simonenko, 02:12
• April 01, 2008
  • Re: [PATCH] PR bootstrap/35169: HP-UX/IA awk bug, Eric Blake, 22:12

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc