Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit
the main index
.
You can also
download the archives in mbox format
.
guile-devel (date)
[
Thread Index
][
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Prev Period
]
Last Modified: Sat Dec 31 2005 10:18:09 -0500
Messages in reverse chronological order
[
Next Period
]
December 31, 2005
Re: No way out.
,
Neil Jerram
,
10:18
December 30, 2005
Re: JIT compiler
,
John Steele Scott
,
21:22
Re: JIT compiler
,
Leonardo Lopes Pereira
,
16:22
JIT compiler
,
klaus schilling
,
15:17
Re: API naming bugs
,
Neil Jerram
,
14:57
Re: API naming bugs
,
Marius Vollmer
,
14:29
JIT compiler
,
Leonardo Lopes Pereira
,
12:44
December 29, 2005
Re: [PATCH] Removed a useless GC invocation
,
Neil Jerram
,
06:31
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Neil Jerram
,
05:51
December 28, 2005
Re: [PATCH] SRFI-34, SRFI-60 and core bindings
,
Neil Jerram
,
15:17
Re: No way out.
,
Neil Jerram
,
11:13
Re: No way out.
,
Neil Jerram
,
11:02
December 25, 2005
API naming bugs
,
Andy Wingo
,
19:50
December 23, 2005
Re: 1.8
,
Kevin Ryde
,
20:01
1.8 [was: GC improvements]
,
Andy Wingo
,
10:47
Re: [PATCH] GC code cleanup
,
Han-Wen Nienhuys
,
07:25
Re: GC improvements
,
Han-Wen Nienhuys
,
07:18
Re: [PATCH] Accurate count of freed cells
,
Han-Wen Nienhuys
,
07:09
December 22, 2005
Re: more futures
,
Mikael Djurfeldt
,
05:10
Re: problem with futures?
,
Mikael Djurfeldt
,
05:09
December 21, 2005
more futures
,
Andy Wingo
,
18:32
problem with futures?
,
Andy Wingo
,
18:32
December 20, 2005
GC improvements
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
11:34
[PATCH] GC code cleanup
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
11:17
[PATCH] Accurate count of freed cells
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
08:21
December 19, 2005
[PATCH] Improved `scm_from_locale_symbol ()' + `scm_take_locale_symbol ()'
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
12:24
Re: Memory leak in scm_c_eval_string?
,
Michael J. Barillier
,
12:11
December 17, 2005
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Marius Vollmer
,
08:20
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Neil Jerram
,
05:29
December 16, 2005
Re: Memory leak in scm_c_eval_string?
,
Kevin Ryde
,
18:17
Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Marius Vollmer
,
15:08
[PATCH] Removed a useless GC invocation
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
12:15
Memory leak in scm_c_eval_string?
,
Michael J. Barillier
,
10:46
Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
07:38
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Tomas Zerolo
,
04:26
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
03:57
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Neil Jerram
,
03:34
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Tomas Zerolo
,
01:18
December 15, 2005
Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Kevin Ryde
,
19:42
Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Han-Wen Nienhuys
,
19:11
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Neil Jerram
,
14:49
Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
04:45
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
04:14
December 14, 2005
Re: Segmentation fault in CVS
,
Neil Jerram
,
18:34
Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:20
Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Han-Wen Nienhuys
,
18:04
Re: Segmentation fault in CVS
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:57
Re: Getting source location information
,
Kevin Ryde
,
16:55
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Kevin Ryde
,
16:11
Re: [PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Kevin Ryde
,
15:59
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Neil Jerram
,
14:39
[PATCH] Turning `scm_is_pair ()' into a macro
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
09:47
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
09:10
Re: [PATCH] Marking weak alist vectors
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
05:45
Re: Segmentation fault in CVS
,
Andy Wingo
,
05:20
Re: [PATCH] SRFI-34, SRFI-60 and core bindings
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
05:19
December 13, 2005
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Neil Jerram
,
20:03
Re: Segmentation fault in CVS
,
Neil Jerram
,
19:00
Re: [PATCH] Marking weak alist vectors
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:50
Re: [PATCH] SRFI-34, SRFI-60 and core bindings
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:59
Re: What's the matter?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:07
Re: No way out.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
15:36
December 12, 2005
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.
,
Rob Browning
,
20:34
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.
,
Greg Troxel
,
14:40
December 11, 2005
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.
,
Rob Browning
,
01:09
December 10, 2005
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.
,
Kevin Ryde
,
20:00
Re: *still* can't compile guile 1.7
,
Neil Jerram
,
07:10
December 09, 2005
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Rob Browning
,
23:24
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Kevin Ryde
,
19:12
Re: Future of ice-9/slib.scm.
,
Rob Browning
,
15:43
*still* can't compile guile 1.7
,
Andy Wingo
,
11:33
Re: Segmentation fault in CVS
,
Neil Jerram
,
09:13
December 08, 2005
Re: [PATCH] `any' and `every' in `(oop goops util)'
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
02:53
December 07, 2005
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Rob Browning
,
20:28
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Ken Raeburn
,
19:58
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Rob Browning
,
19:52
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Kevin Ryde
,
19:30
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:47
Re: What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Kevin Ryde
,
16:31
Re: scm_leave_guile, setjmp, and caller-saved registers
,
Ken Raeburn
,
15:49
Segmentation fault in CVS
,
Neil Jerram
,
15:02
Re: [PATCH] `any' and `every' in `(oop goops util)'
,
Neil Jerram
,
14:43
Re: [PATCH] Marking weak alist vectors
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
07:13
Re: [PATCH] SRFI-34, SRFI-60 and core bindings
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
05:18
Re: [PATCH] `any' and `every' in `(oop goops util)'
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
05:01
Re: [PATCH] Augmenting the doc of `define-module'
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
03:14
December 06, 2005
Re: No way out.
,
Rob Browning
,
20:55
Re: No way out.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:31
Re: No way out.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:08
Re: [PATCH] Augmenting the doc of `define-module'
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:00
Re: I don't want to maintain this
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:38
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:05
Re: [PATCH] Marking weak alist vectors
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:55
Re: [PATCH] SRFI-34, SRFI-60 and core bindings
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:23
Re: [PATCH] `any' and `every' in `(oop goops util)'
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:11
Re: Progress in porting to 1.7, but still work to do
,
Bruce Korb
,
18:03
Re: Progress in porting to 1.7, but still work to do
,
Neil Jerram
,
17:45
Re: compile fixen
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:38
Re: bug with read-string!/partial
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:14
What are the arguments in favor of delay/force in eval.c?
,
Rob Browning
,
16:14
Re: SRFI 61: a more general `cond' clause
,
Marius Vollmer
,
15:53
Re: [PATCH] Fixing `gc-live-object-stats'
,
Neil Jerram
,
14:16
Re: scm_leave_guile, setjmp, and caller-saved registers
,
Marius Vollmer
,
14:10
Re: Code review for thread safeness
,
Marius Vollmer
,
13:58
Re: No way out.
,
Han-Wen Nienhuys
,
06:55
December 05, 2005
Re: What's the matter?
,
Bruce Korb
,
18:51
Re: No way out.
,
Kevin Ryde
,
17:21
Re: What's the matter with "scm_string_p()"?
,
Han-Wen Nienhuys
,
09:00
Re: [PATCH] Augmenting the doc of `define-module'
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
07:09
Re: [PATCH] Fixing `gc-live-object-stats'
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
03:52
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
03:33
December 04, 2005
Re: No way out.
,
Bruce Korb
,
23:35
Re: No way out.
,
Bruce Korb
,
23:08
Progress in porting to 1.7, but still work to do
,
Bruce Korb
,
16:52
December 03, 2005
Re: What's the matter with "scm_string_p()"?
,
Kevin Ryde
,
18:26
What's the matter with "scm_string_p()"?
,
Bruce Korb
,
16:26
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
,
Neil Jerram
,
15:03
Re: [PATCH] Fixing `gc-live-object-stats'
,
Neil Jerram
,
14:32
December 01, 2005
Re: Getting source location information
,
Ludovic Courtès
,
07:19
[
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc