[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?
From: |
Uwe Brauer |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:01:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) XEmacs/21.5-b32 (linux) |
>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:27:50 +0100, Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> wrote:
Hello
> Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Ralf,
>> Awesome. I'll test-drive the things I use regularly tomorrow and
>> report back if I find a problem.
> Hm, the XEmacs version I have installed (21.5 (beta 31) "ginger") has
> it:
> (require FEATURE &optional FILENAME NOERROR)
Has I have been told by Stephen Turnbull, the package
should be 21.4.X compatible not 21.5.X!
(That is why org mode vs >7 cannot be easily made into a
xemacs pkg since it works in 21.5.X but not in 21.4.X)
>> Adding `(featurep 'xemacs)' as the first parameter of the `and' call
>> might be enough to fix the problem because XEmacs likely does not know
>> about DBus anyway but I'm not sure yet if this is the right solution.
Most likely this is the better solution.
Uwe Brauer
- [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, David Kastrup, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/28
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/29
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?,
Uwe Brauer <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Tassilo Horn, 2012/11/30
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] How about a new release?, Ralf Angeli, 2012/11/30