[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros
From: |
Mosè Giordano |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jul 2016 15:57:50 +0200 |
Hi Arash,
2016-07-08 19:11 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati <address@hidden>:
> Hi Mosè,
>
> Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 2016-07-08 12:55 GMT+02:00 Arash Esbati <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> Following up myself, I think I have a working setup for an AUCTeX ispell
>>> dictionary (diff attached). I hope this way, it will be easy to add
>>> more macro/env names. I would appreciate any comments. After that, I
>>> will update the documentation and make it available.
>
> Thanks for looking at this.
>
>> Thanks for your work! Some questions:
>>
>> * why all those `eval-when-compile'?
>
> The final regexp which goes into byte-compiled file is built with:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> (defvar TeX-ispell-skip-cmds-one-arg-regexp
> (eval-when-compile
> (concat "\\\\"
> (regexp-opt (TeX-ispell-sort-skip-cmds-list 1) t)))
> "Regexp of LaTeX commands with one argument to be skipped.")
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Ok, then why this regexp is built with `eval-when-compile'?
> I needed the other `eval-when-compile' to make the compiler happy.
> Byte-compile `tex-ispell.el' and have a look at the .elc file.
>
>> * why you decided to add all elements of `TeX-ispell-skip-cmds-list'
>> in `tex-ispell.tex', instead of adding the appropriate macros in each
>> style file? Performance?
>
> I think on the long run with lots of macros, it will help. I did it
> mainly because I wanted to feed `regexp-opt' with all the macros and
> have one regexp to do the work. I started with the idea to have macros
> in the respective style files, but the one-file-approach seems easier to
> maintain. Parsed elements can still be added by styles with
> `TeX-ispell-skip-set(car|cdr)'.
Fine, thanks.
>> * is is possible to skip the second
>> argument of "\begin{}{}"? For example. in the first example you
>> showed us in this thread `ispell' still wants to check "llr".
>
> Yes it is. It works for me for tabularx & tabulary with (already in
> the last diff):
>
> (TeX-ispell-skip-setcdr
> '(...
> ("tabular[xy]" ispell-tex-arg-end 2)))
>
> I see that I have missed \begin{tabular*} (since I never use it ;-),
> should be easily fixed with:
>
> (TeX-ispell-skip-setcdr
> '(...
> ("tabular[*xy]" ispell-tex-arg-end 2)))
Maybe the regexp should be "tabular[*xy]?", right?
Bye,
Mosè
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Arash Esbati, 2016/07/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Arash Esbati, 2016/07/12
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, David Kastrup, 2016/07/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Mosè Giordano, 2016/07/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, David Kastrup, 2016/07/17
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Spell checking of macros, Arash Esbati, 2016/07/18