auctex-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New entry in amsmath.el


From: Ikumi Keita
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX-devel] New entry in amsmath.el
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:45:14 +0900

Hi Arash,

>>>>> Arash Esbati <address@hidden> writes:
> Thanks for checking.  I think the confusing issue here `Accent symbol'
> vs. `Accented symbol'.  Take for instance the entry for `overset'.  The
> first argument is the `Accent symbol' and the second one would be the
> accented one.  Looking at the diff above, I think we should just change
> the entries to:

>       '("overset" "Above symbol" "Symbol")
>       '("underset" "Below symbol" "Symbol")
>       '("overunderset" "Above symbol" "Below symbol" "Symbol")

> WDYT, does it make sense?

Oh, I'm very sorry.  I was totally confused about it.

>> (The order of the arguments is different from \overset and \underset...
>> I wonder why amsmath developer chose such confusing order.)

> I'm not sure if I understand this comment.  This code looks consistent
> to me:

Exactly.  Why didn't I look at definitions of \overset and \underset as
well?

I apologize to all for my careless comments.

Best regards,
Ikumi Keita



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]