[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: support for latexmk?
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
Re: support for latexmk? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:49:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hi Uwe,
Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:
> In the last couple of days I came again into contact with latexmk (but
> for for org-latex-preview, which can be configured using
> latexmk+pdf+imagemagick, not sure that latex-preview has this feature)
>
> Be it as it may, I also found using package-list-packages
> https://github.com/tom-tan/auctex-latexmk
> which is a bit outdated.
>
> So I was wondering whether there was any discussion to which extend
> auctex supports the use latexmk. Maybe there was a discussion, but I
> missed or forgot it.
We added support (well, somewhat) for LatexMk to AUCTeX sometimes ago.
It is actually waiting for some user feedback. I suppose you have an
up-to-date AUCTeX installation, just hit C-c C-c and choose LaTeXMk
instead of LaTeX.
Best, Arash
- support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?,
Arash Esbati <=
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- [a rather larger inconvience] (was: support for latexmk?), Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Paul Nelson, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/18