[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a rather larger inconvience
From: |
Paul Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: a rather larger inconvience |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2024 22:12:35 +0200 |
> That being said, let us turn now to LaTeXMk.
>
> 1. This new function seems to ignore, TeX-output-dir and therefore
> the directory publications is cluttered with the files generated
> by the compilation process.
>
This can be fixed by adding the following to the latexmk command
(compare with
https://github.com/ultronozm/auctex-cont-latexmk.el/blob/86eba36913a2980ce64bf116ff54587aa554a66c/auctex-cont-latexmk.el#L230):
(concat " -outdir=" (shell-quote-argument TeX-output-dir))
I guess it just requires a simple change to TeX-command-expand and
TeX-command-list, but I'm not super familiar with those.
- support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: support for latexmk?, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- [a rather larger inconvience] (was: support for latexmk?), Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/16
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/17
- Re: a rather larger inconvience,
Paul Nelson <=
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/18
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/21
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Uwe Brauer, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Ikumi Keita, 2024/08/22
- Re: a rather larger inconvience, Arash Esbati, 2024/08/22