[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Do autotools support free Microsoft compiler?
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: Do autotools support free Microsoft compiler? |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 13:19:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Braden McDaniel <address@hidden> writes:
> autoconf, basically. autoconf's check for whether it can use -g is
> busted, but the effect of this is just a benign warning from the
> compiler. (I have a patch for this that I submitted to
> autoconf-patches many months ago; but it was ignored.)
Sorry, I dropped the ball on that. I didn't like your patch, but
didn't have time to compose a better one at the time. I just took the
time, installed the following patch instead. Please try CVS Autoconf
on your compiler installation to see whether this approach works for
you.
2004-04-20 Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
* lib/autoconf/c.m4 (_AC_PROG_CC_G, _AC_PROG_CXX_G): Don't
consider -g to work if it generates warnings when plain compiles
don't. Problem reported by Braden McDaniel in:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2003-07/msg00014.html
--- c.m4.~1.185.~ 2004-04-19 10:10:00 -0700
+++ c.m4 2004-04-20 12:49:07 -0700
@@ -501,13 +501,25 @@ AC_LANG_POP(C)dnl
# Check whether -g works, even if CFLAGS is set, in case the package
# plays around with CFLAGS (such as to build both debugging and normal
# versions of a library), tasteless as that idea is.
+# Don't consider -g to work if it generates warnings when plain compiles don't.
m4_define([_AC_PROG_CC_G],
[ac_test_CFLAGS=${CFLAGS+set}
ac_save_CFLAGS=$CFLAGS
-CFLAGS="-g"
AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CC accepts -g, ac_cv_prog_cc_g,
- [_AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()], [ac_cv_prog_cc_g=yes],
- [ac_cv_prog_cc_g=no])])
+ [ac_save_c_werror_flag=$ac_c_werror_flag
+ ac_c_werror_flag=yes
+ ac_cv_prog_cc_g=no
+ CFLAGS="-g"
+ _AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()],
+ [ac_cv_prog_cc_g=yes],
+ [CFLAGS=""
+ _AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()],
+ [],
+ [ac_c_werror_flag=$ac_save_c_werror_flag
+ CFLAGS="-g"
+ _AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()],
+ [ac_cv_prog_cc_g=yes])])])
+ ac_c_werror_flag=$ac_save_c_werror_flag])
if test "$ac_test_CFLAGS" = set; then
CFLAGS=$ac_save_CFLAGS
elif test $ac_cv_prog_cc_g = yes; then
@@ -710,14 +722,25 @@ AC_LANG_POP(C++)dnl
# Check whether -g works, even if CXXFLAGS is set, in case the package
# plays around with CXXFLAGS (such as to build both debugging and
# normal versions of a library), tasteless as that idea is.
+# Don't consider -g to work if it generates warnings when plain compiles don't.
m4_define([_AC_PROG_CXX_G],
[ac_test_CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS+set}
ac_save_CXXFLAGS=$CXXFLAGS
-CXXFLAGS="-g"
AC_CACHE_CHECK(whether $CXX accepts -g, ac_cv_prog_cxx_g,
- [_AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()],
- [ac_cv_prog_cxx_g=yes],
- [ac_cv_prog_cxx_g=no])])
+ [ac_save_cxx_werror_flag=$ac_cxx_werror_flag
+ ac_cxx_werror_flag=yes
+ ac_cv_prog_cxx_g=no
+ CXXFLAGS="-g"
+ _AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()],
+ [ac_cv_prog_cxx_g=yes],
+ [CXXFLAGS=""
+ _AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()],
+ [],
+ [ac_cxx_werror_flag=$ac_save_cxx_werror_flag
+ CXXFLAGS="-g"
+ _AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([AC_LANG_PROGRAM()],
+ [ac_cv_prog_cxx_g=yes])])])
+ ac_cxx_werror_flag=$ac_save_cxx_werror_flag])
if test "$ac_test_CXXFLAGS" = set; then
CXXFLAGS=$ac_save_CXXFLAGS
elif test $ac_cv_prog_cxx_g = yes; then
- Re: Do autotools support free Microsoft compiler?,
Paul Eggert <=