[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: const/volatile vs. -Werror
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: const/volatile vs. -Werror |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:55:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
* Eric Blake wrote on Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 02:46:22PM CEST:
>
> This patch allows:
> ./testsuite -d -k 'C keywords' CFLAGS='-Wall -Werror'
> to succeed with gcc 3.4.4. There were so many tests in AC_C_CONST, some
> with duplicate names but different scopes, that I relettered the local
> variables.
Eric, please make my life easier and resubmit a *minimal* patch
that allows me to quickly see what's going on. No renaming.
Let's put this in a bit stronger words: until the alpha release,
I will reject any non-minimal patch for new stuff, even bugfixes.
I don't have unlimited time, and I don't want this release to
take unlimited time, and after 2.60 there'll be enough time for
everyone to do cleanup patches and thus introduce new bugs.
Thanks,
Ralf
> 2006-04-07 Eric Blake <address@hidden>
>
> * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_CONST, AC_C_VOLATILE): Avoid warnings
> from gcc.