[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autotest annoyances
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: autotest annoyances |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Apr 2006 14:25:24 +0000 |
Hi Ralf,
> Instead of logically splitting up the check here, how about adding an
> argument, as below? (I'm a bit unsure myself, but it looks somewhat
> cleaner this way, as it prevents the user from screwing up by forgetting
> the AT_CLEANUP inadvertently.)
>
> # AT_CHECK_AT(TITLE, SUITE-CODE, [XFAIL-CONDITION], [STATUS = 0],
> -# [STDOUT := ignore], STDERR)
> +# [STDOUT := ignore], STDERR, [POST-TEST-CODE])
> # ---------------------------------------------------------------
> # Create a new test named TITLE that runs a minimal Autotest test suite,
> # SUITE-CODE. Call AT_XFAIL_IF with XFAIL-CONDITION. STATUS and STDERR pass
> # directly to the AT_CHECK that call the minimal test suite. STDOUT is not
> -# used, but it is reserved for future use.
> +# used, but it is reserved for future use. Put additional toplevel tests
> +# code in POST-TEST-CODE.
I like your idea better. I will resubmit with that paradigm.
More comments coming to your other reply.
--
Eric Blake