Re: m4_wrap behavior

[Ralf Wildenhues]

[ let's drop the autoconf list ]

Hello Eric, Paul,

* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, 16 Jun 2006 04:08:24 -0700:

Wow, when you said you needed more time, did you mean you'd
do away with sleeping...?  ;-)

> address@hidden (Eric Blake) writes:
> 
> > Speaking of which, here is an idea towards a simpler
> > m4-2.0-proof definition of m4_wrap, with less overhead
> > per use of m4_wrap than my earlier patch (no ChangeLog
> > provided, as this is just an idea for now).
> 
> That suggestion looks good to me (needs a documentation update for
> m4_wrap of course).  I like that it clearly doesn't affect behavior
> unless m4 2.0 is used.  I'd vote for this going into 2.60.

Me too.

Cheers,
Ralf