Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

autoconf-patches (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Tue Apr 29 2008 16:42:32 -0400 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• Re: tr portability, Eric Blake, 2008/04/26
  • Re: tr portability, Eric Blake, 2008/04/26
    • Re: tr portability, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/26
  • Re: tr portability, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/28
• mention git vs. bootstrapping, Eric Blake, 2008/04/15
• New tests: errexit, input from stdin., Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/13
  • Re: New tests: errexit, input from stdin., Eric Blake, 2008/04/14
    • Re: New tests: errexit, input from stdin., Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/14
• NEWS: Post-release update., Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/13
  • Re: NEWS: Post-release update., Eric Blake, 2008/04/13
• Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/12
  • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/12
    • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/12
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/13
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/13
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/13
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/13
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bob Proulx, 2008/04/13
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/13
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bruno Haible, 2008/04/26
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Eric Blake, 2008/04/29
      • Re: INSTALL should tell about particular systems, HP-UX cc, Bob Proulx, 2008/04/29
• AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION quoting, Eric Blake, 2008/04/10
• Re: libtool 2.2.2 does not work on OSF/1 4.0d, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/09
• stronger docs on @SHELL@ usage in Makefile, Eric Blake, 2008/04/09
  • Re: stronger docs on @SHELL@ usage in Makefile, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/09
    • Re: stronger docs on @SHELL@ usage in Makefile, Eric Blake, 2008/04/09
• 2.62 nearly ready, Eric Blake, 2008/04/06
  • Re: 2.62 nearly ready, Eric Blake, 2008/04/08
    • Re: 2.62 nearly ready, Eric Blake, 2008/04/09
• configure/makefile cleanup, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
  • Re: configure/makefile cleanup, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
    • Re: configure/makefile cleanup, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
      • Re: configure/makefile cleanup, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
      • Re: configure/makefile cleanup, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
• carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
  • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
    • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Working os/2 configuratie, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/05
      • Re: Working os/2 configuratie, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Elbert Pol, 2008/04/06
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Jim Meyering, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
      • Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, Eric Blake, 2008/04/05
    • Re: Re: carriage return line endings vs. literal ^M in status.m4, ziedar, 2008/04/06
• upstream file sync, Eric Blake, 2008/04/03
  • Re: upstream file sync, Eric Blake, 2008/04/03
    • Re: upstream file sync, Eric Blake, 2008/04/03
      • Re: upstream file sync, Eric Blake, 2008/04/03
• Recommend M4 1.4.11, Eric Blake, 2008/04/02
• Re: Stack-like AC_LANG_WERROR, Andrey Simonenko, 2008/04/02
  • Re: Stack-like AC_LANG_WERROR, Andrey Simonenko, 2008/04/07
• Re: [PATCH] PR bootstrap/35169: HP-UX/IA awk bug, Eric Blake, 2008/04/01

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc