[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 21:43:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Eric Blake wrote on Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 08:16:28PM CEST:
> > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/autoconf.git/commit/?id=abe172
>
> Well, that patch was indeed the cause of a regression. However, bison was
> lucky that it was not using a shell comment, which is broken even in 2.63.
> Here's the patch I'm considering which fixes not only the regression, but
> also
> the original bug in handling shell comments, although I'm not sure if my
> wording in NEWS is the best.
Sounds ok to me.
Cheers,
Ralf
> --- a/NEWS
> +++ b/NEWS
> @@ -1,5 +1,12 @@
> GNU Autoconf NEWS - User visible changes.
>
> +* Major changes in Autoconf 2.64 (2009-??-??) [stable]
> + Released by Eric Blake, based on git versions 2.63b.*.
> +
> +** Ensure AT_CHECK can support commands that include a # given with
> + proper m4 quoting. For shell comments, this is a new feature; for
> + non-shell comments, this fixes a regression introduced in 2.63b.
> +
- 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Eric Blake, 2009/04/06
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/04/06
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Eric Blake, 2009/04/06
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Eric Blake, 2009/04/09
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Eric Blake, 2009/04/13
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/04/15
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Eric Blake, 2009/04/15
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Eric Blake, 2009/04/23
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Eric Blake, 2009/04/23
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/04/23
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Eric Blake, 2009/04/24
- Re: 2.63b autotest vs. bison testsuite, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/04/24