[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
From: |
Pedro Alves |
Subject: |
Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Apr 2012 10:03:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120316 Thunderbird/11.0 |
On 04/04/2012 12:53 AM, Miles Bader wrote:
> I suspect there are better, cleaner, ways to accomplish the underlying
> goal, but I suppose the gcc maintainers don't want to spend the time
> fiddling around with their build infrastructure for such a minor
> issue...
Why speculate? I haven't seen any hint on what the better, cleaner,
way to accomplish this is.
--
Pedro Alves
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/04/03
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Ian Lance Taylor, 2012/04/03
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Pedro Alves, 2012/04/03