Re: svn copy conflicts with autotools ?

[Stepan Kasal]

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:35:58PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> Speaking of manuals, the FAQ section of the Automake manual also
> have a node called "CVS" and listing pros, cons, and workarounds.

I have noticed a typo there, see the patch below.
As usual, thank you very much for nicely written documentation.

Stepan

Index: doc/automake.texi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/automake/automake/doc/automake.texi,v
retrieving revision 1.68
diff -u -r1.68 automake.texi
--- doc/automake.texi   24 Nov 2004 22:44:17 -0000      1.68
+++ doc/automake.texi   2 Dec 2004 09:42:19 -0000
@@ -7431,7 +7431,7 @@
 update, not the original timestamp of this revision.  This is meant to
 make sure that @command{make} notices sources files have been updated.
 
-This times tamp shift is troublesome when both sources and generated
+This timestamp shift is troublesome when both sources and generated
 files are kept under CVS.  Because CVS processes files in alphabetical
 order, @file{configure.ac} will appear older than @file{configure}
 after a @command{cvs update} that updates both files, even if