[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 14:04:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-11-01) |
* David Everly wrote on Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:52:12PM CET:
> On 11/9/06, Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 05:46:23PM -0700, David Everly wrote:
> >> I put together a test case before sending my email, the only line in
> >> the one Makefile.am is the one I gave containing test.txt.
> >
> >well, I created configure.ac and Makefile.am:
[...]
> This is almost identical to what I tried.
Thanks for the example. So this is the same issue as discussed in this
thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2006-09/msg00014.html
> >and the distcheck failed with the expected message:
> >
> >make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../test.txt', needed by `all-am'.
> >Stop.
Stepan, I don't think you did exactly as you wrote. You wrote:
> >Then I run:
> >
> >autoreconf -i
> >./configure
> >make distcheck
But I think you used
../configure
instead.
> >I used recent CVS build of Autoconf, and a CVS version of Automake
> >which is slightly older than 1.10.
>
> Ok, so there must be something that is better about CVS because your
> test also does not fail for me.
Nope.
Cheers,
Ralf
- sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/08
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/08
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/08
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/09
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, David Everly, 2006/11/10
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/13
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Stepan Kasal, 2006/11/10
- Re: sysconf_DATA v. dist_sysconf_DATA, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/11/10