[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiple cpu's
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: multiple cpu's |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 12:46:20 +0200 |
Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
...
>> OK, so it generates Makefile's that are fully capable of handling the -j
>> switch to make?
>
> Mostly. Problems should be reported, please include a copy of the make
> output of the failed build.
Hi Ralf,
On a related note, it'd sure be nice if "make -j4 check" would run its
tests in parallel. Especially on an SMP system, and/or when some
tests sleep for a few (interminable :-) seconds.
Of course, this might not be trivial, especially trying to keep
the resulting Makefile.in portable. However, even if it means
I'd need to use a special option to generate a GNU-make-only
Makefile.in, I'd happily use the result for day to day work.
Currently, the check-TESTS rule is just a big for-loop.
Recording pass, fail, xfail, and skip subtotals in parallel might
be a challenge, but I'd be happy to sacrifice those along
with portability, in return for parallelized tests.
- multiple cpu's, Bob Rossi, 2007/08/10
- Re: multiple cpu's, Andreas Schwab, 2007/08/10
- Re: multiple cpu's, Bob Rossi, 2007/08/10
- Re: multiple cpu's, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/10
- Re: multiple cpu's,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: multiple cpu's, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/12
- Re: multiple cpu's, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/20
- Re: multiple cpu's, Jim Meyering, 2007/08/20
- Re: multiple cpu's, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/20
- parallel testsuite execution (was: multiple cpu's), Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/20