automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ``install -C'' / unnecessarily updating time stamps


From: Thomas Schwinge
Subject: Re: ``install -C'' / unnecessarily updating time stamps
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 20:12:49 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hello!

It's been some time, but still...

On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 09:23:15PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Benoit Sigoure <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2006-10/msg00070.html
> 
> I installed the following to Automake install-sh to implement
> "install-sh -C", which is the second part of that patch.

Thank you!  I'm already using that one, it works fine.

However now there is another issue, see this snippet:

    make[2]: Entering directory `[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build'
    test -z "//lib" || /bin/mkdir -p 
"[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib"
     /bin/bash [...]/build-aux/install-sh -C -m 644 'libhurd-ihash.a' 
'[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib/libhurd-ihash.a'
     /bin/bash [...]/build-aux/install-sh -C -m 644 'libhurd-ihash-nomalloc.a' 
'[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib/libhurd-ihash-nomalloc.a'
     i686-pc-viengoos-gnu-ranlib 
'[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib/libhurd-ihash.a'
     i686-pc-viengoos-gnu-ranlib 
'[...]/libhurd-ihash.kernel.build.install//lib/libhurd-ihash-nomalloc.a'

I'm using the `-C' option -- but that doesn't help much if Automake
decides to have ranlib tinker with the files afterwards again.  Should
this be changed in Automake: to first run ranlib (or whatever else might
be done) on them and then install them?


Regards,
 Thomas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]