automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: silent build rules


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: silent build rules
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:13:59 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Ralf Wildenhues on 4/14/2009 2:32 PM:
> Hi Eric, Bob,

Hello to you as well,

>>> +Enable the machinery for less verbose build output (@pxref{Options}).
>> Are you going to document the (optional) argument that specifies the default?
> 
> I might, I haven't decided yet.  After all, it's so easy to get almost
> the same effect with
>   : ${enable_silent_rules=yes}
>   AM_SILENT_RULES

>
> The biggest argument that I see against documenting the optional
> argument to AM_SILENT_RULES is that it complicates the logic even more.

At this point, I'm okay with either leaving it undocumented, or removing
the optional argument altogether.  But I'm pretty much convinced that
documenting the optional parameter is a bad idea.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknlNNcACgkQ84KuGfSFAYAsYwCgtttjGWVPlxevAE/ywj+kG+5F
3p4AoKI/zWGBTuvG2kUv/usD+AKM5k44
=52uh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]