[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: silent installs
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: silent installs |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 05:59:51 -0500 |
> And there are many examples of the opposite where less verbose
> output is useful, automake already supports silent compilation.
> I know that
Yes, but automake --silent is a different tool, perhaps it should
learn suppress the install mgs as well as other libtool msgs such
as relinking as finish msgs?
I was refering to AM_SILENT_RULES, which supresses `make all' output;
so this is not a very controversial topic, it is already in automake
and used by several projects. Would you like to work on this feature?
The maintainers can't accept a patch that doesn't exist after all...
- silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Ralf Corsepius, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Ralf Corsepius, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Ralf Corsepius, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/30
- Re: silent installs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/31
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/31
- Re: silent installs, Russ Allbery, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
Re: silent installs, Steffen Dettmer, 2010/01/29