Re: [Main] %union can be define in user declaration.

[Pascal Bart]

Hello,

>I think this is the wrong approach.  It seems a bit too complex
>to me.

Yes, me too.

>I was merely asking for the removal of the %yystype _use_ in the
>skeletons (but do not remove the code), and for the output of the
>definition directly into %prologue.

This is another way, but I'm afraid this break secondary goal, which
is to leave bison generate parsers written in another language than
C-like.

Pascal Bart (address@hidden)