[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;'
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;' |
Date: |
04 Mar 2002 19:08:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
>>>>> "Hans" == Hans Aberg <address@hidden> writes:
Hans> At 16:05 +0100 2002/03/04, Akim Demaille wrote: The current
Hans> implementation of %expect seems to depend on the type of
Hans> algorithm used.
>> Nah! Of course not. Since there is only one implementation in the
>> current Bison.
Hans> When one is changing the algorithm, of course. :-)
I lost your point.
>> And in the future, with more algorithms implemented, the
>> implementation of %expect will not change. What might change is
>> the number of conflicts.
Hans> Specifically, the same input may produce different parsing
Hans> results with different algorithms (i.e., the languages parsed
Hans> becomes different). Or do you have a proof, showing the
Hans> opposite? :-)
Certainly not, since that's what I say.
- RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Paul Eggert, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/03
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Akim Demaille, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/04
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;',
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: RFC: Requiring the ending `;', Hans Aberg, 2002/03/04